Public statements and writings by people in the record provide context for the concerns they raised about AI safety, ethics, governance, and accountability. The collection includes peer-reviewed papers, policy reports, essays, and departure statements, each linked to the person and concern it helps document.
Forecasts & Warnings separately records future-facing statements with observable outcomes, dated warnings, and contemporaneous claims. Each item preserves the original source and identifies how it is classified.
Forecasts are future-facing statements with observable outcomes. Warnings and claims capture important insider assessments that are not suitable for an accuracy score. Resolution criteria added after an original statement are dated and disclosed.
Under editorial review: this tracker's resolution criteria and adjudications are being re-reviewed. Individual records remain visible; aggregate confirmation scores are hidden until the review is complete.
3 open forecasts · 9 warnings and contemporaneous claims · 6 records under review
Resolution— Jun 2025
The Washington Post and multiple outlets reported on compressed safety testing timelines at major labs through 2024-2025. Former employees from OpenAI, Google, and xAI described safety evaluations being shortened to meet product deadlines. OpenAI shipped GPT-4o with abbreviated red-teaming.
View evidenceVerbatim excerpt.Source
Paraphrase — not a verbatim quotation.Source
Verbatim excerpt.Source
Resolution— Jan 2025
AI hype accelerated through 2024-2025 rather than fading. Investment in AI companies surged to record levels, major tech companies increased AI spending dramatically, and public attention intensified with the mainstream adoption of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude.
View evidenceVerbatim excerpt.Source
Verbatim excerpt.Source
Verbatim excerpt.Source
Verbatim excerpt.Source
Verbatim excerpt.Source
Verbatim excerpt.Source
Paraphrase — not a verbatim quotation.Source
Paraphrase — not a verbatim quotation.Source